<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Jury Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keenetrial.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog</link>
	<description>You Know Law. We Know Juries.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:49:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple Jury Persuasion: Make Your Expert Optimally Persuasive by Doug Keene</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/12/simple-jury-persuasion-make-your-expert-optimally-persuasive/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Keene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=928#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Tim,  Thanks for your comment.  As I re-read the blog post I wish I had written it more artfully, so we might be discussing a different nuance.  My point is that willingness to respectfully  disagree and express mastery over the opposition expert material is crucial.  You are right, that your expert isn&#039;t likely to achieve that during cross, but more likely in your direct or re-direct.  They can either do that by commenting on prior testimony or by commenting on expert reports.  But I agree  with you completely; experts who try to score while on defense (during cross) usually look argumentative, elicit non-responsiveness objections, are viewed as improper advocates, and are not liked as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,  Thanks for your comment.  As I re-read the blog post I wish I had written it more artfully, so we might be discussing a different nuance.  My point is that willingness to respectfully  disagree and express mastery over the opposition expert material is crucial.  You are right, that your expert isn&#8217;t likely to achieve that during cross, but more likely in your direct or re-direct.  They can either do that by commenting on prior testimony or by commenting on expert reports.  But I agree  with you completely; experts who try to score while on defense (during cross) usually look argumentative, elicit non-responsiveness objections, are viewed as improper advocates, and are not liked as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple Jury Persuasion: Make Your Expert Optimally Persuasive by Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/12/simple-jury-persuasion-make-your-expert-optimally-persuasive/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=928#comment-920</guid>
		<description>It is not ridiculous at all on the be nice comment - likeability is critical.

Great post, although I do have a question about this:
&quot;On cross-examination, ask them to explain how their explanation is more correct than the other side’s expert testimony.&quot;

I assume this is you coaching your expert on how to deal with the other side&#039;s cross?  Good advice, but a good lawyer on the other side will make this difficult or impossible.  I tend to ask very tight, very leading questions on cross and not permit much wiggle to avoid having the opposing expert try to turn the tables on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not ridiculous at all on the be nice comment &#8211; likeability is critical.</p>
<p>Great post, although I do have a question about this:<br />
&#8220;On cross-examination, ask them to explain how their explanation is more correct than the other side’s expert testimony.&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume this is you coaching your expert on how to deal with the other side&#8217;s cross?  Good advice, but a good lawyer on the other side will make this difficult or impossible.  I tend to ask very tight, very leading questions on cross and not permit much wiggle to avoid having the opposing expert try to turn the tables on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know about story-telling, but do you know to wear red? by Stark County Law Library Weblog</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/08/you-know-about-story-telling-but-do-you-know-to-wear-red/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark County Law Library Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=921#comment-919</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] post was written by Douglas Keene: &quot;By now we all know to tell jurors a story. Articles like this one from Neuromarketing Blog are [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://keenetrial.com/hermes/web06/b2292/as.keenetrialconsult/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] post was written by Douglas Keene: &quot;By now we all know to tell jurors a story. Articles like this one from Neuromarketing Blog are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “I didn’t know truth had a gender” by Sui Generis--a New York law blog: Blawg Review #254</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2009/12/02/i-didnt-know-truth-had-a-gender/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Sui Generis--a New York law blog: Blawg Review #254</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=223#comment-918</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] And, finally does &quot;truth&quot; have a gender? Rita Handrich explores this idea. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://keenetrial.com/hermes/web06/b2292/as.keenetrialconsult/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] And, finally does &quot;truth&quot; have a gender? Rita Handrich explores this idea. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lighter Skin, More Like Me by Situationism in the Blogosphere &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/02/10/lighter-skin-more-like-me/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Situationism in the Blogosphere &#171; The Situationist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=896#comment-917</guid>
		<description>[...] From Jury Room: “Lighter Skin, More Like Me” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Jury Room: “Lighter Skin, More Like Me” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know about story-telling, but do you know to wear red? by Rita Handrich</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/08/you-know-about-story-telling-but-do-you-know-to-wear-red/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Handrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=921#comment-916</guid>
		<description>I think jurors might think it curious if a male showed up in a red suit. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think jurors might think it curious if a male showed up in a red suit. <img src='http://keenetrial.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know about story-telling, but do you know to wear red? by Rita Handrich</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/08/you-know-about-story-telling-but-do-you-know-to-wear-red/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Handrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=921#comment-915</guid>
		<description>Attractive = increased liking = more persuasive. And being tall is still good too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attractive = increased liking = more persuasive. And being tall is still good too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know about story-telling, but do you know to wear red? by Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/08/you-know-about-story-telling-but-do-you-know-to-wear-red/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=921#comment-914</guid>
		<description>In high-school psychology 20+years ago I remember being told that men wearing red ties were seen as more attractive.

Attractive = persuasive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In high-school psychology 20+years ago I remember being told that men wearing red ties were seen as more attractive.</p>
<p>Attractive = persuasive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know about story-telling, but do you know to wear red? by Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/03/08/you-know-about-story-telling-but-do-you-know-to-wear-red/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=921#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.

Where can I get my red suit for court?  Then again, I am not sure the same result would obtain for men ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.</p>
<p>Where can I get my red suit for court?  Then again, I am not sure the same result would obtain for men &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you assess juror morality by counting tattoos? by Stark County Law Library Weblog</title>
		<link>http://keenetrial.com/blog/2010/02/24/can-you-assess-juror-morality-by-counting-tattoos/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Stark County Law Library Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenetrial.com/blog/?p=882#comment-910</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] post was written by Rita Handrich: &quot;Maybe you can. While ink on the skin doesn&#039;t mean what it used to (see our post here)&#160;it [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://keenetrial.com/hermes/web06/b2292/as.keenetrialconsult/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] post was written by Rita Handrich: &quot;Maybe you can. While ink on the skin doesn&#39;t mean what it used to (see our post here)&nbsp;it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
