Trial Skills
Recent Comments
- @Hollins_Law on A new issue of The Jury Expert is up!
- @dopaminergic13 on The Millennial demand for work/life balance: A harbinger of good to come?
- @benchandbarllc on News flash: The way standard jury patterns are written is confusing
- @ycpsych on Is the Millennial Generation beginning to differentiate? Maybe!
- @dopaminergic13 on Is the Millennial Generation beginning to differentiate? Maybe!
- @ASTCNow on The Millennial demand for work/life balance: A harbinger of good to come?
- @jeffgblackwell on News flash: The way standard jury patterns are written is confusing
- New blog post: The dilemma of the ‘Expert’ #Witness ow.ly/jUEN1 #testimony 10 hours ago
- Jobs Crisis at Best Law Schools Is Much Worse Than U Think: 1/5 of students [or more] unemployed ow.ly/jUF4W 10 hours ago
- Now this is must read research! There Is No Single Sexy Chin ow.ly/jUESk 10 hours ago
Blog archive
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (13)
- February 2013 (11)
- January 2013 (13)
- December 2012 (13)
- November 2012 (13)
- October 2012 (14)
- September 2012 (7)
- August 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (10)
- June 2012 (13)
- May 2012 (13)
- April 2012 (13)
- March 2012 (13)
- February 2012 (13)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (13)
- November 2011 (13)
- October 2011 (13)
- September 2011 (13)
- August 2011 (13)
- July 2011 (13)
- June 2011 (13)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (13)
- March 2011 (13)
- February 2011 (12)
- January 2011 (12)
- December 2010 (14)
- November 2010 (14)
- October 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (13)
- August 2010 (13)
- July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (12)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (13)
- December 2009 (13)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (7)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
ABA Journal Blawg 100!
Categories
- Beliefs & values (237)
- Bias (221)
- Case Preparation (183)
- Case Presentation (242)
- Case Selection (6)
- Challenges to the jury system (4)
- Communication (110)
- Decision-making (140)
- Economic downturn (4)
- Forensic evidence (14)
- Generation or Age of Juror (22)
- Internet & jurors (20)
- It's hard to be a woman (22)
- Law Office Management (20)
- Leadership (5)
- Mediation & Negotiation (4)
- NeuroLaw (23)
- On being a man (8)
- Pre-trial research (122)
- Self Presentation (51)
- Simple Jury Persuasion (106)
- Simply Resisting Persuasion (1)
- Social Networking (9)
- Trends and Goofy Stuff (6)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Voir Dire & Jury Selection (71)
- Witness Preparation (88)
Popular posts
- Men: Exude confidence, masculinity, authority, and power!
- Simple Jury Persuasion: Christian religious concepts increase racial prejudice
- Simple Jury Persuasion: When beautiful is not so good
- Simple Jury Persusasion: Make them sad and they can’t be mad
- Simple Jury Persuasion: Look inside at the very best 'you' there is…
RSS via eMail
Forty-five percent of employers report they use social networking sites to screen applicants for employment as of August 2009 and even more plan to do so in the near future. And it’s pretty common knowledge that lawyers are using on-line profiles to gather information regarding prospective jurors. But now the tables are turning in an odd way. Attorneys: take note! The judge may want to be your “friend”.
A recent article in the Texas Lawyer tells about three Texas judges and how they use Facebook and other social networking sites to network, solicit campaign support, and “other purposes”. It’s that last part that’s the real clincher. These judges are reading profiles of attorneys, witnesses, and plaintiffs/defendants that share “too much” and could be used in court against them.
We are all figuring out how to use Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn as we go about our daily activities. While it is likely never a good idea to call the judge an “evil, unfair witch” in your blog, keep in mind the following as you develop and refine your on-line persona:
- If you are using social networking sites for business purposes, have two sites—one personal and one professional.
- Assume that even your personal site becomes publicly distributed—keep your profiles and content “G-rated”.
- Keep all of your posts suitable for universal consumption– watch what you post, tweet, blog, or text.
- And don’t make my own mistake—double check the “To:” line on emails just before you hit send, not moments afterward.
Sure—it will make you less witty on the web, but it won’t come back to bite you. The line between the personal and the professional is blurred as never before. We don’t have control over how others may use easily collectible information about us. As you think about the growing field of e-discovery—consider what you are putting out there about yourself. It is likely not just Texas judges that are watching.



RT @BlawgTweets: From @keenetrial: “Friending” the Judge http://bit.ly/wn0Zu